icon


Previous Section. Link to Book Room 
Next Section.

Darwin's "Emotions" - Introduction

Charles Darwin (1809-1882)

ON THE EXPRESSION OF THE EMOTIONS IN MAN AND ANIMALS.



INTRODUCTION.



MANY works have been written on Expression, but a greater number

on Physiognomy,--that is, on the recognition of character through

the study of the permanent form of the features.  With this

latter subject I am not here concerned.  The older treatises,[1]

which I have consulted, have been of little or no service to me.

The famous `Conferences'[2] of the painter Le Brun, published in 1667,

is the best known ancient work, and contains some good remarks.

Another somewhat old essay, namely, the `Discours,' delivered

1774-1782, by the well-known Dutch anatomist Camper,[3] can hardly

be considered as having made any marked advance in the subject.

The following works, on the contrary, deserve the fullest consideration.



Sir Charles Bell, so illustrious for his discoveries in physiology,

published in 1806 the first edition, and in



[1] J. Parsons, in his paper in the Appendix to the

`Philosophical Transactions' for 1746, p.  41, gives a list

of forty-one old authors who have written on Expression.



[2] Conferences sur l'expression des differents Caracteres

des Passions.'  Paris, 4to, 1667.  I always quote from the

republication of the `Conferences' in the edition of Lavater,

by Moreau, which appeared in 1820, as given in vol.  ix.  p.  257.



[3] `Discours par Pierre Camper sur le moyen de representer les

diverses passions,' &c. 1792.  1844 the third edition of his

`Anatomy and Philosophy of Expression.'[4] He may with justice

be said, not only to have laid the foundations of the subject

as a branch of science, but to have built up a noble structure.

His work is in every way deeply interesting; it includes graphic

descriptions of the various emotions, and is admirably illustrated.

It is generally admitted that his service consists chiefly

in having shown the intimate relation which exists between

the movements of expression and those of respiration.

One of the most important points, small as it may at first appear,

is that the muscles round the eyes are involuntarily contracted

during violent expiratory efforts, in order to protect

these delicate organs from the pressure of the blood.

This fact, which has been fully investigated for me with

the greatest kindness by Professors Donders of Utrecht,

throws, as we shall hereafter see, a flood of light on several

of the most important expressions of the human countenance.

The merits of Sir C. Bell's work have been undervalued or quite

ignored by several foreign writers, but have been fully admitted

by some, for instance by M. Lemoine,[5] who with great justice

says:--"Le livre de Ch.  Bell devrait etre medite par quiconque

essaye de faire parler le visage de l'homme, par les philosophes

aussi bien que par les artistes, car, sous une apparence plus

legere et sous le pretexte de l'esthetique, c'est un des

plus beaux monuments de la science des rapports du physique

et du moral."







[4] I always quote from the third edition, 1844, which was published

after the death of Sir C. Bell, and contains his latest corrections.

The first edition of 1806 is much inferior in merit, and does not include

some of his more important views.



[5] `De la Physionomie et de la Parole,' par Albert Lemoine, 1865, p.  101.



From reasons which will presently be assigned, Sir C. Bell did not

attempt to follow out his views as far as they might have been carried.

He does not try to explain why different muscles are brought into

action under different emotions; why, for instance, the inner ends

of the eyebrows are raised, and the corners of the mouth depressed,

by a person suffering from grief or anxiety.



In 1807 M. Moreau edited an edition of Lavater on Physiognomy,[6] in which

he incorporated several of his own essays, containing excellent 
descriptions

of the movements of the facial muscles, together with many valuable 
remarks.

He throws, however, very little light on the philosophy of the subject.

For instance, M. Moreau, in speaking of the act of frowning, that is,

of the contraction of the muscle called by French writers the _soucilier_

(_corrigator supercilii_), remarks with truth:--"Cette action des

sourciliers est un des symptomes les plus tranches de l'expression des

affections penibles ou concentrees."  He then adds that these muscles,

from their attachment and position, are fitted "a resserrer,

a concentrer les principaux traits de la _face_, comme il convient

dans toutes ces passions vraiment oppressives ou profondes, dans ces

affections dont le sentiment semble porter l'organisation a revenir sur

elle-meme, a se contracter et a _s'amoindrir_, comme pour offrir moins

de prise et de surface a des impressions redoutables ou importunes."

He who thinks that remarks of this kind throw any light on the meaning

or origin of the different expressions, takes a very different view

of the subject to what I do.





[6] `L'Art de connaitre les Hommes,' &c., par G. Lavater.  The earliest

edition of this work, referred to in the preface to the edition of 1820

in ten volumes, as containing the observations of M. Moreau, is said

to have been published in 1807; and I have no doubt that this is correct,

because the `Notice sur Lavater' at the commencement of volume i.

is dated April 13, 1806.  In some bibliographical works, however, the date

of 1805--1809 is given, but it seems impossible that 1805 can be correct.

Dr. Duchenne remarks (`Mecanisme de la Physionomie Humaine,'-8vo edit.

1862, p.  5, and `Archives Generales de Medecine,' Jan. et Fev.

1862) that M. Moreau "_a compose pour son ouvrage un article important_,"

&c., in the year 1805; and I find in volume i.  of the edition

of 1820 passages bearing the dates of December 12, 1805, and another

January 5, 1806, besides that of April 13, 1806, above referred to.

In consequence of some of these passages having thus been COMPOSED in 1805,

Dr. Duchenne assigns to M. Moreau the priority over Sir C. Bell,

whose work, as we have seen, was published in 1806.  This is a very

unusual manner of determining the priority of scientific works;

but such questions are of extremely little importance in comparison

with their relative merits.  The passages above quoted from M. Moreau

and from Le Brun are taken in this and all other cases from the edition

of 1820 of Lavater, tom.  iv.  p.  228, and tom.  ix.  p.  279.  " In

the above passage there is but a slight, if any, advance in the philosophy

of the subject, beyond that reached by the painter Le Brun, who, in 1667,

in describing the expression of fright, says:--"Le sourcil qui est abaisse

d'un cote et eleve de l'autre, fait voir que la partie elevee semble le

vouloir joindre au cerveau pour le garantir du mal que l'ame apercoit,

et le cote qui est abaisse et qui parait enfle, -nous fait trouver

dans cet etat par les esprits qui viennent du cerveau en abondance,

comme polir couvrir l'aine et la defendre du mal qu'elle craint;

la bouche fort ouverte fait voir le saisissement du coeur, par le sang

qui se retire vers lui, ce qui l'oblige, voulant respirer, a faire

un effort qui est cause que la bouche s'ouvre extremement, et qui,

lorsqu'il passe par les organes de la voix, forme un son qui n'est

point articule; que si les muscles et les veines paraissent enfles,

ce n'est que par les esprits que le cerveau envoie en ces parties-la."

I have thought the foregoing sentences worth quoting, as specimens

of the surprising nonsense which has been written on the subject.



`The Physiology or Mechanism of Blushing,' by Dr. Burgess, appeared in 
1839,

and to this work I shall frequently refer in my thirteenth Chapter.



In 1862 Dr. Duchenne published two editions, in folio and octavo,

of his `Mecanisme de la Physionomie Humaine,' in which he analyses

by means of electricity, and illustrates by magnificent photographs,

the movements of the facial muscles.  He has generously permitted me

to copy as many of his photographs as I desired.  His works have been

spoken lightly of, or quite passed over, by some of his countrymen.

It is possible that Dr. Duchenne may have exaggerated the importance

of the contraction of single muscles in giving expression;

for, owing to the intimate manner in which the muscles are connected,

as may be seen in Henle's anatomical drawings[7]--the best I believe

ever published it is difficult to believe in their separate action.

Nevertheless, it is manifest that Dr. Duchenne clearly apprehended

this and other sources of error, and as it is known that he was

eminently successful in elucidating the physiology of the muscles

of the hand by the aid of electricity, it is probable that he is

generally in the right about the muscles of the face.  In my opinion,

Dr. Duchenne has greatly advanced the subject by his treatment of it.

No one has more carefully studied the contraction of each separate muscle,

and the consequent furrows produced on the skin.  He has also,

and this is a very important service, shown which muscles are least

under the separate control of the will.  He enters very little into

theoretical considerations, and seldom attempts to explain why certain

muscles and not others contract under the influence of certain emotions.

A distinguished French anatomist, Pierre Gratiolet, gave a course

of lectures on Expression at the Sorbonne, and his notes were published

(1865) after his death, under the title of `De la Physionomie et des

Mouvements d'Expression.' This is a very interesting work, full of

valuable observations.  His theory is rather complex, and, as far as it

can be given in a single sentence (p. 65), is as follows:--"Il resulte,

de tous les faits que j'ai rappeles, que les sens, l'imagination et la

pensee ellememe, si elevee, si abstraite qu'on la suppose, ne peuvent

s'exercer sans eveiller un sentiment correlatif, et que ce sentiment se

traduit directement, sympathiquement, symboliquement ou metaphoriquement,

dans toutes les spheres des organs exterieurs, qui la racontent tous,

suivant leur mode d'action propre, comme si chacun d'eux avait

ete directement affecte."



[7] `Handbuch der Systematischen Anatomie des Menschen.'

Band I. Dritte Abtheilung, 1858.



Gratiolet appears to overlook inherited habit, and even to some

extent habit in the individual; and therefore he fails, as it seems

to me, to give the right explanation, or any explanation at all,

of many gestures and expressions.  As an illustration of what he calls

symbolic movements, I will quote his remarks (p. 37), taken from

M. Chevreul, on a man playing at billiards.  "Si une bille devie

legerement de la direction que le joueur pretend zlui imprimer,

ne l'avez-vous pas vu cent fois la pousser du regard, de la tete et

meme des epaules, comme si ces mouvements, purement symboliques,

pouvaient rectifier son trajet?  Des mouvements non moins significatifs

se produisent quand la bille manque d'une impulsion suffisante.

Et cliez les joueurs novices, ils sont quelquefois accuses au

point d'eveiller le sourire sur les levres des spectateurs."

Such movements, as it appeirs to me, may be attributed simply to habit.

As often as a man has wished to move an object to one side, he has

always pushed it to that side when forwards, he has pushed it forwards;

and if he has wished to arrest it, he has pulled backwards.

Therefore, when a man sees his ball travelling in a wrong direction,

and he intensely wishes it to go in another direction, he cannot avoid,

from long habit, unconsciously performing movements which in other

cases he has found effectual.



As an instance of sympathetic movements Gratiolet gives (p. 212)

the following case:--"un jeune chien A oreilles droites,

auquel son maitre presente de loin quelque viande appetissante,

fixe avec ardeur ses yeux sur cet objet dont il suit tous

les mouvements, et pendant que les yeux regardent, les deux oreilles

se portent en avant comme si cet objet pouvait etre entendu."

Here, instead of speaking of sympathy between the ears and eyes,

it appears to me more simple to believe, that as dogs during

many generations have, whilst intently looking at any object,

pricked their ears in order to perceive any sound; and conversely

have looked intently in the direction of a sound to which they

may have listened, the movements of these organs have become

firmly associated together through long-continued habit.



Dr. Piderit published in 1859 an essay on Expression, which I

have not seen, but in which, as he states, he forestalled

Gratiolet in many of his views.  In 1867 he published his

`Wissenschaftliches System der Mimik und Physiognomik.'  It is hardly

possible to give in a few sentences a fair notion of his views;

perhaps the two following sentences will tell as much as can

be briefly told:  "the muscular movements of expression are

in part related to imaginary objects, and in part to imaginary

sensorial impressions.  In this proposition lies the key

to the comprehension of all expressive muscular movements."

(s. 25) Again, "Expressive movements manifest themselves

chiefly in the numerous and mobile muscles of the face,

partly because the nerves by which they are set into motion originate

in the most immediate vicinity of the mind-organ, but partly

also because these muscles serve to support the organs of sense."

(s. 26.) If Dr. Piderit had studied Sir C. Bell's work,

he would probably not have said (s. 101) that violent

laughter causes a frown from partaking of the nature of pain;

or that with infants (s. 103) the tears irritate the eyes,

and thus excite the contraction of the surrounding in muscles.

Many good remarks are scattered throughout this volume,

to which I shall hereafter refer.



Short discussions on Expression may be found in various works,

which need not here be particularised.  Mr. Bain, however,

in two of his works has treated the subject at some length.

He says,[8] "I look upon the expression so-called as part and parcel

of the feeling.  I believe it to be a general law of the mind

that along with the fact of inward feeling or consciousness,

there is a diffusive action or excitement over the bodily members."

In another place he adds, "A very considerable number of the facts

may be brought under the following principle:  namely, that states

of pleasure are connected with an increase, and states of pain

with an abatement, of some, or all, of the vital functions."

But the above law of the diffusive action of feelings seems too

general to throw much light on special expressions.



Mr. Herbert Spencer, in treating of the Feelings in his `Principles

of Psychology' (1855), makes the following remarks:--"Fear,

when strong, expresses itself in cries, in efforts to hide or escape,

in palpitations and tremblings; and these are just the manifestations

that would accompany an actual experience of the evil feared.

The destructive passions are shown in a general tension of the

muscular system, in gnashing of the teeth and protrusion of the claws,

in dilated eyes and nostrils in growls; and these are weaker

forms of the actions that accompany the killing of prey."

Here we have, as I believe, the true theory of a large number

of expressions; but the chief interest and difficulty of the

subject lies in following out the wonderfully complex results.

I infer that some one (but who he is I have not been able to ascertain)

formerly advanced a nearly similar view, for Sir C. Bell says,[9]

"It has been maintained that what are called the external signs

of passion, are only the concomitants of those voluntary movements

which the structure renders necessary."  Mr. Spencer has also

published[10] a valuable essay on the physiology of Laughter,

in which he insists on "the general law that feeling passing

a certain pitch, habitually vents itself in bodily action,"

and that "an overflow of nerve-force undirected by any motive,

will manifestly take first the most habitual routes; and if these

do not suffice, will next overflow into the less habitual ones."

This law I believe to be of the highest importance in throwing

light on our subject.`



[8] `The Senses and the Intellect,' 2nd edit.  1864, pp.  96 and 288.

The preface to the first edition of this work is dated June, 1855.

See also the 2nd edition of Mr. Bain's work on the `Emotions and Will.'



[9] `The Anatomy of Expression,' 3rd edit.  p.  121.



[10] `Essays, Scientific, Political, and Speculative,' Second Series,

1863, p.  111.  There is a discussion on Laughter in the First Series

of Essays, which discussion seems to me of very inferior value.



[11] Since the publication of the essay just referred to,

Mr. Spencer has written another, on "Morals and Moral Sentiments,"

in the `Fortnightly Review,' April 1, 1871, p.  426.  He has, also,

now published his final conclusions in vol.  ii.  of the second edit.

of the `Principles of Psychology,' 1872, p.  539.  I may state,

in order that I may not be accused of trespassing on

Mr. Spencer's domain, that I announced in my `Descent of Man,'

that I had then written a part of the present volume:  my first MS.

notes on the subject of expression bear the date of the year 1838.



All the authors who have written on Expression, with the exception

of Mr. Spencer--the great expounder of the principle of Evolution--

appear to have been firmly convinced that species, man of

course included, came into existence in their present condition.

Sir C. Bell, being thus convinced, maintains that many of our

facial muscles are "purely instrumental in expression;" or are "a

special provision" for this sole object.[12] But the simple fact

that the anthropoid apes possess the same facial muscles as we

do,[13] renders it very improbable that these muscles in our

case serve exclusively for expression; for no one, I presume,

would be inclined to admit that monkeys have been endowed with

special muscles solely for exhibiting their hideous grimaces.

Distinct uses, independently of expression, can indeed be assigned

with much probability for almost all the facial muscles.



Sir C. Bell evidently wished to draw as broad a distinction as possible

between man and the lower animals; and he consequently asserts that with

"the lower creatures there is no expression but what may be referred,

more or less plainly, to their acts of volition or necessary instincts."

He further maintains that their faces "seem chiefly capable of expressing

rage and fear."[14] But man himself cannot express love and humility

by external signs, so plainly as does a dog, when with drooping ears,

hanging lips, flexuous body, and wagging tail, he meets his beloved master.

Nor can these movements in the dog be explained by acts of volition

or necessary instincts, any more than the beaming eyes and smiling

cheeks of a man when he meets an old friend.  If Sir C. Bell had been

questioned about the expression of affection in the dog, he would no doubt

have answered that this animal had been created with special instincts,

adapting him for association with man, and that all further enquiry

on the subject was superfluous.



[12] `Anatomy of Expression,' 3rd edit.  pp.  98, 121, 131.



[13] Professor Owen expressly states (Proc. Zoolog.  Soc.  1830, p.

28) that this is the case with respect to the Orang, and specifies

all the more important muscles which are well known to serve with man

for the expression of his feelings.  See, also, a description of several

of the facial muscles in the Chimpanzee, by Prof. Macalister, in `Annals

and Magazine of Natural History,' vol.  vii.  May, 1871, p.  342.



[14] `Anatomy of Expression,' pp.  121, 138.



Although Gratiolet emphatically denies[15] that any muscle

has been developed solely for the sake of expression,

he seems never to have reflected on the principle of evolution.

He apparently looks at each species as a separate creation.

So it is with the other writers on Expression.  For instance,

Dr. Duchenne, after speaking of the movements of the limbs,

refers to those which give expression to the face, and remarks:[16]

"Le createur n'a donc pas eu a se preoccuper ici des besoins de

la mecanique; il a pu, selon sa sagesse, ou--que l'on me pardonne

cette maniere de parler--par une divine fantaisie, mettre en

action tel ou tel muscle, un seul ou plusieurs muscles a la fois,

lorsqu'il a voulu que les signes caracteristiques des passions,

meme les plus fugaces, lussent ecrits passagerement sur la

face de l'homme. Ce langage de la physionomie une fois cree,

il lui a suffi, pour le rendre universel et immuable, de donner

a tout etre humain la faculte instinctive d'exprimer toujours

ses sendments par la contraction des memes muscles."



Many writers consider the whole subject of Expression as inexplicable.

Thus the illustrious physiologist Muller, says,[17] "The completely

different expression of the features in different passions shows that,

according to the kind of feeling excited, entirely different groups

of the fibres of the facial nerve are acted on.  Of the cause of this

we are quite ignorant."



[15] `De la Physionomie,' pp.  12, 73.



[16] `Mecanisme de la Physionomie Humaine,' 8vo edit.  p.  31.



[17] `Elements of Physiology,' English translation, vol.  ii.  p.  934.



No doubt as long as man and all other animals are viewed

as independent creations, an effectual stop is put to our

natural desire to investigate as far as possible the causes

of Expression.  By this doctrine, anything and everything can

be equally well explained; and it has proved as pernicious with

respect to Expression as to every other branch of natural history.

With mankind some expressions, such as the bristling of the hair under

the influence of extreme terror, or the uncovering of the teeth under

that of furious rage, can hardly be understood, except on the belief

that man once existed in a much lower and animal-like condition.

The community of certain expressions in distinct though allied species,

as in the movements of the same facial muscles during laughter by man

and by various monkeys, is rendered somewhat more intelligible,

if we believe in their descent from a common progenitor.

He who admits on general grounds that the structure and habits

of all animals have been gradually evolved, will look at the whole

subject of Expression in a new and interesting light.



The study of Expression is difficult, owing to the movements

being often extremely slight, and of a fleeting nature.

A difference may be clearly perceived, and yet it may be impossible,

at least I have found it so, to state in what the difference consists.

When we witness any deep emotion, our sympathy is so strongly

excited, that close observation is forgotten or rendered

almost impossible; of which fact I have had many curious proofs.

Our imagination is another and still more serious source of error;

for if from the nature of the circumstances we expect

to see any expression, we readily imagine its presence.

Notwithstanding Dr. Duchenne's great experience, he for a long

time fancied, as he states, that several muscles contracted

under certain emotions, whereas he ultimately convinced himself

that the movement was confined to a single muscle.



In order to acquire as good a foundation as possible, and to ascertain,

independently of common opinion, how far particular movements

of the features and gestures are really expressive of certain states

of the mind, I have found the following means the most serviceable.

In the first place, to observe infants; for they exhibit many emotions,

as Sir C. Bell remarks, "with extraordinary force;" whereas, in after life,

some of our expressions "cease to have the pure and simple source

from which they spring in infancy."[18]



In the second place, it occurred to me that the insane ought to

be studied, as they are liable to the strongest passions, and give

uncontrolled vent to them.  I had, myself, no opportunity of doing this,

so I applied to Dr. Maudsley and received from him an introduction

to Dr. J. Crichton Browne, who has charge of an immense asylum

near Wakefield, and who, as I found, had already attended to the subject.

This excellent observer has with unwearied kindness sent me copious

notes and descriptions, with valuable suggestions on many points;

and I can hardly over-estimate the value of his assistance.  I owe also,

to the kindness of Mr. Patrick Nicol, of the Sussex Lunatic Asylum,

interesting statements on two or three points.



Thirdly Dr. Duchenne galvanized, as we have already seen, certain muscles

in the face of an old man, whose skin was little sensitive, and thus

produced various expressions which were photographed on a large scale.

It fortunately occurred to me to show several of the best plates,

without a word of explanation, to above twenty educated persons

of various ages and both sexes, asking them, in each case,

by what emotion or feeling the old man was supposed to be agitated;

and I recorded their answers in the words which they used.

Several of the expressions were instantly recognised by almost everyone,

though described in not exactly the same terms; and these may,

I think, be relied on as truthful, and will hereafter be specified.

On the other hand, the most widely different judgments were pronounced

in regard to some of them.  This exhibition was of use in another way,

by convincing me how easily we may be misguided by our imagination;

for when I first looked through Dr. Duchenne's photographs,

reading at the same time the text, and thus learning what was intended,

I was struck with admiration at the truthfulness of all, with only

a few exceptions.  Nevertheless, if I had examined them without

any explanation, no doubt I should have been as much perplexed,

in some cases, as other persons have been.



[18] "Anatomy of Expression,' 3rd edit.  p.  198.



Fourthly, I had hoped to derive much aid from the great masters

in painting and sculpture, who are such close observers.

Accordingly, I have looked at photographs and engravings of many

well-known works; but, with a few exceptions, have not thus profited.

The reason no doubt is, that in works of art, beauty is the chief object;

and strongly contracted facial muscles destroy beauty.[19] The

story of the composition is generally told with wonderful force

and truth by skilfully given accessories.



[19] See remarks to this effect in Lessing's `Lacooon,' translated

by W. Ross, 1836, p.  19.



Fifthly, it seemed to me highly important to ascertain whether

the same expressions and gestures prevail, as has often been

asserted without much evidence, with all the races of mankind,

especially with those who have associated but little

with Europeans.  Whenever the same movements of the features

or body express the same emotions in several distinct races of man,

we may infer with much probability, that such expressions

are true ones,--that is, are innate or instinctive.

Conventional expressions or gestures, acquired by the individual

during early life, would probably have differed in the

different races, in the same manner as do their languages.

Accordingly I circulated, early in the year 1867, the following

printed queries with a request, which has been fully responded to,

that actual observations, and not memory, might be trusted.

These queries were written after a considerable interval of time,

during which my attention had been otherwise directed,

and I can now see that they might have been greatly improved.

To some of the later copies, I appended, in manuscript,

a few additional remarks:--



(1.) Is astonishment expressed by the eyes and mouth being opened wide,

and by the eyebrows being raised?



(2.) Does shame excite a blush when the colour of the skin

allows it to be visible? and especially how low down the body

does the blush extend?



(3.) When a man is indignant or defiant does he frown, hold his body

and head erect, square his shoulders and clench his fists?



(4) When considering deeply on any subject, or trying to understand

any puzzle, does he frown, or wrinkle the skin beneath the lower eyelids?



(5.) When in low spirits, are the corners of the mouth depressed,

and the inner corner of the eyebrows raised by that muscle which

the French call the "Grief muscle"? The eyebrow in this state

becomes slightly oblique, with a little swelling at the Inner end;

and the forehead is transversely wrinkled in the middle part, but not

across the whole breadth, as when the eyebrows are raised in surprise.

(6.) When in good spirits do the eyes sparkle, with the skin a little

wrinkled round and under them, and with the mouth a little drawn back

at the corners?



(7.) When a man sneers or snarls at another, is the corner of the upper

lip over the canine or eye tooth raised on the side facing the man

whom he addresses?



(8) Can a dogged or obstinate expression be recognized,

which is chiefly shown by the mouth being firmly closed,

a lowering brow and a slight frown?



(9.) Is contempt expressed by a slight protrusion of the lips

and by turning up the nose, and with a slight expiration?



(10) Is disgust shown by the lower lip being turned down,

the upper lip slightly raised, with a sudden expiration,

something like incipient vomiting, or like something spit out

of the mouth?



(11.) Is extreme fear expressed in the same general manner

as with Europeans?




(12.) Is laughter ever carried to such an extreme as to bring

tears into the eyes?



(13.) When a man wishes to show that he cannot prevent something

being done, or cannot himself do something, does he shrug his shoulders,

turn inwards his elbows, extend outwards his hands and open the palms;

with the eyebrows raised?



(14) Do the children when sulky, pout or greatly protrude the lips?



(15.) Can guilty, or sly, or jealous expressions be recognized?

though I know not how these can be defined.



(16.) Is the head nodded vertically in affirmation, and shaken

laterally in negation?





Observations on natives who have had little communication

with Europeans would be of course the most valuable,

though those made on any natives would be of much interest to me.

General remarks on expression are of comparatively little value;

and memory is so deceptive that I earnestly beg it may not be trusted.

A definite description of the countenance under any emotion

or frame of mind, with a statement of the circumstances under

which it occurred, would possess much value.





To these queries I have received thirty-six answers from different 
observers,

several of them missionaries or protectors of the aborigines, to all of 
whom

I am deeply indebted for the great trouble which they have taken, and for

the valuable aid thus received.  I will specify their names, &c., towards

the close of this chapter, so as not to interrupt my present remarks.

The answers relate to several of the most distinct and savage races of man.

In many instances, the circumstances have been recorded under which

each expression was observed, and the expression itself described.

In such cases, much confidence may be placed in the answers.  When the 
answers

have been simply yes or no, I have always received them with caution.

It follows, from the information thus acquired, that the same state

of mind is expressed throughout the world with remarkable uniformity;

and this fact is in itself interesting as evidence of the close similarity

in bodily structure and mental disposition of all the races, of mankind.



Sixthly, and lastly, I have attended.  as closely as I could,

to the expression of the several passions in some of the

commoner animals; and this I believe to be of paramount importance,

not of course for deciding how far in man certain expressions

are characteristic of certain states of mind, but as affording

the safest basis for generalisation on the causes, or origin,

of the various movements of Expression.  In observing animals,

we are not so likely to be biassed by our imagination;

and we may feel safe that their expressions are not conventional.





From the reasons above assigned, namely, the fleeting nature

of some expressions (the changes in the features being often

extremely slight); our sympathy being easily aroused when we

behold any strong emotion, and our attention thus distracted;

our imagination deceiving us, from knowing in a vague manner

what to expect, though certainly few of us know what the exact

changes in the countenance are; and lastly, even our long

familiarity with the subject,--from all these causes combined,

the observation of Expression is by no means easy, as many persons,

whom I have asked to observe certain points, have soon discovered.

Hence it is difficult to determine, with certainty,

what are the movements of the features and of the body,

which commonly characterize certain states of the mind.

Nevertheless, some of the doubts and difficulties have,

as I hope, been cleared away by the observation of infants,--

of the insane,--of the different races of man,--of works of art,--

and lastly, of the facial muscles under the action of galvanism,

as effected by Dr. Duchenne.



But there remains the much greater difficulty of understanding

the cause or origin of the several expressions, and of judging whether

any theoretical explanation is trustworthy.  Besides, judging as

well as we can by our reason, without the aid of any rules,

which of two or more explanations is the most satisfactory, or are

quite unsatisfactory, I see only one way of testing our conclusions.

This is to observe whether the same principle by which one expression can,

as it appears, be explained, is applicable in other allied cases;

and especially, whether the same general principles can be applied

with satisfactory results, both to man and the lower animals.

This latter method, I am inclined to think, is the most serviceable of all.

The difficulty of judging of the truth of any theoretical explanation,

and of testing it by some distinct line of investigation, is the great

drawback to that interest which the study seems well fitted to excite.



Finally, with respect to my own observations, I may state that they

were commenced in the year 1838; and from that time to the present day,

I have occasionally attended to the subject.  At the above date,

I was already inclined to believe in the principle of evolution,

or of the derivation of species from other and lower forms.

Consequently, when I read Sir C. Bell's great work, his view,

that man had been created with certain muscles specially adapted

for the expression of his feelings, struck me as unsatisfactory.

It seemed probable that the habit of expressing our feelings

by certain movements, though now rendered innate, had been

in some manner gradually acquired.  But to discover how such

habits had been acquired was perplexing in no small degree.

The whole subject had to be viewed under a new aspect,

and each expression demanded a rational explanation.

This belief led me to attempt the present work, however imperfectly

it may have been executed.--------





I will now give the names of the gentlemen to whom, as I have said,

I am deeply indebted for information in regard to the expressions

exhibited by various races of man, and I will specify some

of the circumstances under which the observations were in each

case made.  Owing to the great kindness and powerful influence

of Mr. Wilson, of Hayes Place, Kent, I have received from

Australia no less than thirteen sets of answers to my queries.

This has been particularly fortunate, as the Australian aborigines

rank amongst the most distinct of all the races of man.

It will be seen that the observations have been chiefly made

in the south, in the outlying parts of the colony of Victoria;

but some excellent answers have been received from the north.



Mr. Dyson Lacy has given me in detail some valuable observations,

made several hundred miles in the interior of Queensland.

To Mr. R. Brough Smyth, of Melbourne, I am much indebted

for observations made by himself, and for sending me several

of the following letters, namely:--From the Rev. Mr. Hagenauer,

of Lake Wellington, a missionary in Gippsland, Victoria, who has

had much experience with the natives.  From Mr. Samuel Wilson,

a landowner, residing at Langerenong, Wimmera, Victoria.  From the

Rev. George Taplin, superintendent of the native

Industrial Settlement at Port Macleay.  From Mr. Archibald G. Lang,

of Coranderik, Victoria, a teacher at a school where aborigines,

old and young, are collected from all parts of the colony.

From Mr. H. B. Lane, of Belfast, Victoria, a police magistrate

and warden, whose observations, as I am assured, are highly trustworthy.

From Mr. Templeton Bunnett, of Echuca, whose station is on the borders

of the colony of Victoria, and who has thus been able to observe

many aborigines who have had little intercourse with white men.

He compared his observations with those made by two other gentlemen

long resident in the neighbourhood.  Also from Mr. J. Bulmer,

a missionary in a remote part of Gippsland, Victoria.



I am also indebted to the distinguished botanist, Dr. Ferdinand Muller,

of Victoria, for some observations made by himself, and for sending me

others made by Mrs. Green, as well as for some of the foregoing letters.



In regard to the Maoris of New Zealand, the Rev. J. W. Stack has

answered only a few of my queries; but the answers have been

remarkably full, clear, and distinct, with the circumstances

recorded under which the observations were made.



The Rajah Brooke has given me some information with respect

to the Dyaks of Borneo.



Respecting the Malays, I have been highly successful; for Mr. F. Geach

(to whom I was introduced by Mr. Wallace), during his residence as a

mining engineer in the interior of Malacca, observed many natives,

who had never before associated with white men.  He wrote me two long

letters with admirable and detailed observations on their expression.

He likewise observed the Chinese immigrants in the Malay archipelago.



The well-known naturalist, H. M. Consul, Mr. Swinhoe,

also observed for me the Chinese in their native country;

and he made inquiries from others whom he could trust.



In India Mr. H. Erskine, whilst residing in his official

capacity in the Admednugur District in the Bombay Presidency,

attended to the expression of the inhabitants, but found much

difficulty in arriving at any safe conclusions, owing to

their habitual concealment of all emotions in the presence

of Europeans.  He also obtained information for me from Mr. West,

the Judge in Canara, and he consulted some intelligent native

gentlemen on certain points.  In Calcutta Mr. J. Scott,

curator of the Botanic Gardens, carefully observed the various

tribes of men therein employed during a considerable period,

and no one has sent me such full and valuable details.

The habit of accurate observation, gained by his botanical

studies, has been brought to bear on our present subject.

For Ceylon I am much indebted to the Rev. S. O. Glenie for answers

to some of my queries.



Turning to Africa, I have been unfortunate with respect to the negroes,

though Mr. Winwood Reade aided me as far as lay in his power.

It would have been comparatively easy to have obtained information

in regard to the negro slaves in America; but as they have long

associated with white men, such observations would have possessed

little value.  In the southern parts of the continent Mrs. Barber

observed the Kafirs and Fingoes, and sent me many distinct answers.

Mr. J. P. Mansel Weale also made some observations on the natives,

and procured for me a curious document, namely, the opinion,

written in English, of Christian Gaika, brother of the Chief Sandilli,

on the expressions of his fellow-countrymen. In the northern regions

of Africa Captain Speedy, who long resided with the Abyssinians,

answered my queries partly from memory and partly from observations

made on the son of King Theodore, who was then under his charge.

Professor and Mrs. Asa Gray attended to some points in the expressions

of the natives, as observed by them whilst ascending the Nile.



On the great American continent Mr. Bridges, a catechist

residing with the Fuegians, answered some few questions

about their expression, addressed to him many years ago.

In the northern half of the continent Dr. Rothrock attended to the

expressions of the wild Atnah and Espyox tribes on the Nasse River,

in North-Western America.  Mr. Washington Matthews Assistant-Surgeon

in the United States Army, also observed with special care

(after having seen my queries, as printed in the `Smithsonian Report')

some of the wildest tribes in the Western parts of the United States,

namely, the Tetons, Grosventres, Mandans, and Assinaboines;

and his answers have proved of the highest value.



Lastly, besides these special sources of information, I have collected

some few facts incidentally given in books of travels.--------





As I shall often have to refer, more especially in the latter part

of this volume, to the muscles of the human face, I have had a diagram

(fig. 1) copied and reduced from Sir C. Bell's work, and two others,

with more accurate details (figs. 2 and 3), from Herde's well-known

`Handbuch der Systematischen Anatomie des Menschen.'  The same letters

refer to the same muscles in all three figures, but the names are given

of only the more important ones to which I shall have to allude.

The facial muscles blend much together, and, as I am informed,

hardly appear on a dissected face so distinct as they are here represented.

Some writers consider that these muscles consist of nineteen pairs,

with one unpaired;[20] but others make the number much larger,

amounting even to fifty-five, according to Moreau.  They are,

as is admitted by everyone who has written on the subject,

very variable in structure; and Moreau remarks that they are hardly

alike in half-a-dozen subjects.[21] They are also variable in function.

Thus the power of uncovering the canine tooth on one side differs much

in different persons.  The power of raising the wings of the nostrils

is also, according to Dr. Piderit,[22] variable in a remarkable degree;

and other such cases could be given.



[20] Mr. Partridge in Todd's `Cyclopaedia of Anatomy

and Physiology,' vol.  ii.  p.  227.



[21] `La Physionomie,' par G. Lavater, tom.  iv.  1820, p.  274.  On the

number of the facial muscles, see vol.  iv.  pp.  209-211.



[22] " `Mimik und Physiognomik,' 1867, s.  91.



Finally, I must have the pleasure of expressing my obligations to

Mr. Rejlander for the trouble which he has taken in photographing for me

various expressions and gestures.  I am also indebted to Herr Kindermann,

of Hamburg, for the loan of some excellent negatives of crying infants;

and to Dr. Wallich for a charming one of a smiling girl.

I have already expressed my obligations to Dr. Duchenne for generously

permitting me to have some of his large photographs copied and reduced.

All these photographs have been printed by the Heliotype process,

and the accuracy of the copy is thus guaranteed.  These plates are

referred to by Roman numerals.



I am also greatly indebted to Mr. T. W. Wood for the extreme

pains which he has taken in drawing from life the expressions

of various animals.  A distinguished artist, Mr. Riviere,

has had the kindness to give me two drawings of dogs--one in a

hostile and the other in a humble and caressing frame of mind.

Mr. A. May has also given me two similar sketches of dogs.

Mr. Cooper has taken much care in cutting the blocks.

Some of the photographs and drawings, namely, those by Mr. May,

and those by Mr. Wolf of the Cynopithecus, were first reproduced

by Mr. Cooper on wood by means of photography, and then engraved:

by this means almost complete fidelity is ensured.

Previous Section. Link to Book Room 
Next Section.

LinkExchange


This World Wide Web document is a personal research project motivated by the following claim: "Truth is the object of Knowledge of whatever kind; and when we inquire what is meant by Truth, I suppose it is right to answer that Truth means facts and their relations, which stand towards each other pretty much as subjects and predicates in logic. All that exists, as contemplated by the human mind, forms one large system or complex fact, and this of course resolves itself into an indefinite number of particular facts, which, as being portions of a whole, have countless relations of every kind, one towards another." (The Idea of a University, John Henry Newman, 1801-1890)


Top of Page